Burn protective materials

ABSTRACT

A method is described for reducing the afterflame of a flammable, meltable material. A textile composite is described comprising an outer textile comprising a flammable, meltable material, and a heat reactive material comprising a polymer resin-expandable graphite mixture.

CROSS REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application is a continuation-in-part of application Ser. No.11/923,125, filed Oct. 24, 2007.

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

In order to reduce fire related burn injuries, protective clothing isdesired for professionals working in hazardous environments where shortduration exposure to fire is possible, such as search and rescue, andpolice. Protective gear for workers exposed to these conditions shouldprovide some enhanced protection to allow the wearer to get away fromthe hazard quickly and safely, rather than to combat the hazard.

Traditionally, flame resistant protective garments have been made withan outermost layer of an ensemble (the flame-contacting layer)comprising non-combustible, non-melting fabric made of, for example,aramids, polybenzimidazole (PBI), poly p-phenylene-2,6-bezobisoxazole(PBO), modacrylic blends, polyamines, carbon, polyacrylonitrile (PAN),and blends and combinations thereof. These fibers may be inherentlyflame resistant but may have several limitations. Specifically, thesefibers may be very expensive, difficult to dye and print, and may nothave adequate abrasion resistance. Additionally, these fibers pick upmore water and offer unsatisfactory tactile comfort as compared to nylonor polyester based fabrics.

For optimum user performance in environments with occasional flash fireexposure, a lightweight, breathable, waterproof, or water resistantgarment with enhanced burn protection is desired. The cost ofwaterproof, flame resistant, protective clothing has been an importantconsideration for the large number of hazardous exposure applicationsoutside fire protection, thereby precluding the use of typical,inherently flame resistant textiles such as those used in fire fightingcommunity.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

In one embodiment, a material is described that is suitable for use ingarments, such as the outer layer of an outerwear garment, for workersin hazardous environments, which is breathable, waterproof, and flameresistant, while being lightweight, comfortable to wear, flexible, andaffordable. In one embodiment a method is provided for reducing theafterflame of a flammable, meltable material to less than 20 secondswhen tested according to the Horizontal Flame Test, comprising providingan outer textile comprising a flammable, meltable material, andcomprising an inner side and an outer side; providing a heat reactivematerial comprising a polymer resin-expandable graphite mixture, whereinthe expandable graphite has an expansion of at least 900 μm upon heatingto 280° C. by applying the polymer resin-expandable graphite mixture tothe inner surface of the outer textile material to form the heatreactive material, wherein the outer side of the outer textile isexposed to a flame.

In a further embodiment, a two layer textile composite having lowafterflame time and low char length in Edge Ignition Test is formed thatcomprises a meltable, flammable outer textile layer, a thermally stableconvective barrier, and a heat reactive material between the layers,where the heat reactive material comprises a polymer resin-expandablegraphite mixture, and wherein the expandable graphite has an expansiongreater than 9 cc/g and an endotherm greater than 100 J/g.

DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

The operation of the present invention should become apparent from thefollowing description when considered in conjunction with theaccompanying drawings, in which:

FIG. 1 is a schematic illustration of a cross-sectional view of oneembodiment described herein.

FIG. 2 is a schematic illustration of cross-sectional view of anotherembodiment described herein.

FIG. 3 is a schematic illustrating one embodiment described herein.

FIG. 4 is a schematic illustration of another embodiment describedherein.

FIG. 5a is a schematic illustration of a polymer resin-expandablegraphite applied as discrete dots.

FIG. 5b is a schematic illustration of one embodiment of a pattern ofpolymer resin-expandable graphite mixture applied in a grid.

FIG. 6 is a graphical representation of the expansion of expandablegraphites.

FIG. 7 is a schematic representation of samples tested by the HorizontalFlame test described herein.

FIG. 8 is a schematic illustration of another embodiment describedherein.

FIG. 9a is a schematic illustration of a pattern applied as discretedots.

FIG. 9b is a schematic illustration of a pattern applied as a grid.

FIG. 9c is a schematic illustration of a pattern applied as discretedots.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

In one embodiment, a method for reducing the afterflame of a flammable,meltable material is described herein. With reference to FIG. 1, atextile composite (2) comprising an outer textile (10) having aflammable, meltable material is provided with a heat reactive material(20) comprising a polymer resin-expandable graphite mixture. In oneembodiment, the heat reactive material (20) is disposed on an inner side(11) of the outer textile (10). Upon exposure of the outer side (12) ofthe outer textile (10) to a flame, the outer textile provided with alayer of heat reactive material has an afterflame of less than 20seconds, when tested according to the Horizontal Flame Test andSelf-Extinguishing Test method provided herein.

In a further embodiment of the present invention, a thermally stabletextile backer (14) is bonded, for example by the heat reactivematerial, to the inner side (11) of the outer textile (10) of thetextile composite (2) (as illustrated in FIG. 1), and where in use, theouter side (12) of the outer textile (10) is oriented to come in contactwith flame. Upon flame exposure, the meltable outer textile meltstowards the heat reactive material. As the heat reactive material isexpanding, it is believed the thermally stable textile backer holds theexpanding heat reactive material in place to facilitate the absorptionof melt of the meltable outer textile.

Materials suitable for use as a thermally stable textile backer (14)include, for example, textiles which are not meltable according to theMelting and Thermal Stability Test as presented herein. Examples ofsuitable thermally stable textile backers include aramids, flameresistant (FR) cottons, PBI, PBO, FR rayon, modacrylic blends,polyamines, carbon, fiberglass, PAN, polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE), andblends and combinations thereof. Non-thermally stable textiles that aremeltable according to the Melting and Thermal Stability Test are notsuitable as thermally stable textile backer materials for use herein.Textiles which are meltable according to the Melting and ThermalStability Test are suitable as an outer textile including but notlimited to nylon 6, nylon 6,6, polyester, and polypropylene.

In another embodiment, a method is provided for reducing the break-opentime of a textile composite. With reference to one embodimentillustrated in FIG. 2, a textile composite (2) is provided comprising anouter textile (10) having a meltable material which may be eitherflammable or non-flammable. A thermally stable convective barrier (30)is further provided next to an inner side (11) of the outer textile(10), and a heat reactive material (20) is provided therebetween. In onemethod, a textile composite (2) is formed having a break-open time thatis increased by at least 20 seconds over a textile composite constructedof substantially the same materials in which no heat reactive materialis incorporated, when tested according to the method for HorizontalFlame Test described herein. Embodiments comprising textile compositesmay be made according to the methods herein and having an outer textile(10) comprising a meltable material and a heat reactive material (20)wherein the textile composite has an increased break-open time that isgreater than about 30 seconds when tested according to the HorizontalFlame test method described herein.

In one embodiment, a method for making a textile composite is providedin which a textile composite having an outer textile (10) whichcomprises a material that is both meltable and flammable, and whichfurther comprises a thermally stable convective barrier (30) and a heatreactive material (20) between the outer textile and the thermallystable convective barrier, has an increase in break-open time and adecrease in afterflame, when compared to substantially the same textilecomposites formed without a heat reactive material. The break-open andafterflame times are tested according to the test methods for HorizontalFlame Test and Self-Extinguishing Test, respectively, provided herein.In one such embodiment, a textile composite has a break-open time thatis greater than 20 seconds and an afterflame of less than 20 seconds.

In a further embodiment, as exemplified in FIG. 3, the textile composite(2) may comprise a multilayer thermally stable convective barrier (30).The thermally stable convective barrier (30) may comprise two or morelayers of a thermally stable film (34 and 34′) and, for example apolymer layer (35) therebetween. The polymer layer (35) may bewaterproof or air impermeable or both.

In another embodiment, such as the one illustrated in FIG. 4, thetextile composite (2) may further comprise a textile backer (50)positioned on a side of the thermally stable convective barrier (30)that is opposite the heat reactive material (20). The textile backer(50) may be attached to the textile composite with an adhesive (40).Preferably, the backer textile (50) is a thermally stable textilebacker, such as a material which passes Melting and Thermal StabilityTest described herein.

A method is also provided for reducing the predicted percent body burnafter exposure to flame when tested according to the ASTM F1930 GarmentFlammability Test (Pyroman) described herein. The method comprisesproviding a textile composite comprising an outer textile comprising ameltable material and a thermally stable convective barrier, having aheat reactive material between the outer textile and the thermallystable convective barrier. The method further comprises constructing agarment from the textile composite wherein the outer textile is orientedto face away from the body of the mannequin and toward the source of theflame and in contact with flame. After a 4 second exposure during theGarment Flammability Test, a reduction in body burn, afterflame and meltdripping is achieved compared to a garment constructed similarly andwith substantially the same materials but without a heat reactivematerial between the outer textile and the thermally stable convectivebarrier. In certain embodiments, melt dripping is not observed,afterflame is reduced by about 20 seconds and/or a garment having theheat reactive material has a predicted percent body burn that is about 5percentage points lower than a garment constructed without the heatreactive material.

FIG. 6 is a graphic representation of the TMA expansion rates of severalexpandable graphites (A=Nyagraph 351 available from Nyacol Nanotechnologies, Inc.; B=3626 available from Asbury Graphite Mills Inc.;C=3494 Asbury Graphite Mills, Inc.; D=Nyagraph 35 available from NyacolNano technologies, Inc.; E=3538 available from Asbury Graphite Mills,Inc.). An expandable graphite most suitable for use in methods disclosedherein has average expansion rate of at least 9 μm/° C. between about180° C. and 280° C. Depending on the desired properties of the textilecomposite, it may be desirable to use an expandable graphite having anexpansion rate greater than 9 μm/° C. between about 180° C. and 280° C.,or on expansion rate greater than 12 μm/° C. between about 180° C. and280° C., or an expansion rate greater than 15 μm/° C. between about 180°C. and 280° C. One expandable graphite suitable for use in certainembodiments expands by at least 900 microns in TMA Expansion Testdescribed herein when heated to about 280° C. Another expandablegraphite suitable for use in certain embodiments expands by at least 400microns in TMA Expansion Test described herein when heated to about 240°C. If tested using the Furnace Expansion Test described herein,expandable graphite suitable for use in composites and methods describedherein has an average expansion of at least 9 cc/g at 300° C. In oneexample, expandable graphite B (3626 available from Asbury GraphiteMills, Inc.) has an average expansion of about l9 cc/g at 300° C.,whereas expandable graphite E (3538 available from Asbury GraphiteMills, Inc.) has an expansion of only about 4 cc/g at 300° C., whentested by the Furnace Expansion Test described herein.

In certain embodiments, composites are formed comprising expandablegraphite having good expansion and an endotherm of at least about 100J/g when tested according to the DSC Endotherm Test method describedherein. In other embodiments, it may be desirable to use expandablegraphite with endotherm greater than or equal to about 150 J/g, greaterthan or equal to about 200 J/g, or an endotherm greater than or equal toabout 250 J/g. In one embodiment, a composite textile having a meltableouter textile and an expandable graphite having an expansion greaterthan 900 μm at 280° C. and an endotherm greater than 100 J/g is formedhaving an average afterflame value of less than 20 seconds, average charlength of less than a 20 cm, or both, when tested according to the EdgeIgnition Test described herein. In one embodiment, a composite is formedhaving a meltable outer textile, a thermally stable convective barriercomprising expanded PTFE or a thermally stable textile backer, and aheat reactive material comprising a polymer resin-expandable graphitemixture between the meltable outer textile and the thermally stableconvective barrier or thermally stable textile backer. The polymer resinand an expandable graphite having an endotherm of at least 100 J/g, isblended to form a mixture that is applied in a discontinuous pattern toeither material on a surface interface. In other embodiments, textilecomposites can be formed comprising polymer resin-expandable graphitemixtures wherein the textile has an average afterflame of less than 10seconds, or less than 2 seconds; textile composites may be formed havingan average char length less than 15 cm, or less than 10 cm, when testedaccording to the Edge Ignition Test.

Expandable graphite particle size suitable for present invention shouldbe chosen so that the polymer resin-expandable graphite mixture may beapplied with the selected application method. For example, where thepolymer resin-expandable graphite mixture is applied by a gravureprinting techniques, the expandable graphite particle size should besmall enough to fit in the gravure cells.

Polymer resins having a melt or softening temperature of less than 280°C. are suitable for use in disclosed embodiments. In one embodimentpolymer resins used in methods described herein are sufficientlyflowable or deformable to allow the expandable graphite to expandsubstantially upon heat exposure at or below 300 C, preferably at orbelow 280° C. Other polymer resins suitable for use in the heat reactivematerial allow the expandable graphite to sufficiently expand attemperatures below the pyrolysis temperature of the meltable outertextile. It may be desirable that the extensional viscosity of a polymerresin is low enough to allow for the expansion of expandable graphiteand high enough to maintain the structural integrity of the heatreactive material after expansion of the mixture of polymer resin andexpandable graphite. In another embodiment a polymer resin is used whichhas a storage modulus between 10³ and 10⁸ dyne/cm² and Tan delta betweenabout 0.1 and about 10 at 200° C. In another embodiment a polymer resinis used that has a storage modulus between 10³ and 10⁶ dyne/cm². Inanother embodiment a polymer resin is used that has a storage modulusbetween 10³ and 10⁴ dyne/cm². Polymer resins suitable for use in someembodiments have a modulus and elongation at around 300 C or less,suitable to allow the graphite to expand. Polymer resins suitable foruse in some embodiments are elastomeric. Other polymer resins suitablefor use in some embodiments are cross-linkable, such as crosslinkablepolyurethane such as Mor-melt R7001E (from Rohm & Haas). In otherembodiments, suitable polymer resins are thermoplastic having a melttemperature between 50° C. and 250° C., such as Desmomelt VP KA 8702(from Bayer Material Science LLC). Polymer resins suitable for use inembodiments described herein comprise polymers which include but are notlimited to polyesters, thermoplastic polyurethanes and crosslinkablepolyurethanes, and combinations thereof. Other polymer resins maycomprises one or more polymers selected from polyester, polyamide,acrylic, vinyl polymer, polyolefin. Other polymer resins may comprisesilicone or epoxy. Flame retardant materials optionally may beincorporated in the polymer resin, such as melamine, phosphorous, andbrominated compounds, metal hydroxides such as alumina trihydrate (ATH),borates, and combinations thereof.

In some embodiments of the polymer resin-expandable graphite mixture,the mixture, upon expansion, forms a plurality of tendrils comprisingexpanded graphite. The total surface area of the polymerresin-expandable graphite mixture increases significantly when comparedto the same mixture prior to expansion. In one embodiment, the surfacearea of the mixture is increased at least five times after expansion. Inanother embodiment, the surface area of the mixture is increased atleast ten times after expansion. In addition, tendrils will often extendoutward from the expanded mixture. Where the polymer resin-expandablegraphite mixture is situated on a substrate in a discontinuous form, thetendrils will extend to at least partially fill the open areas betweenthe discontinuous domains. In a further embodiment, the tendrils will beelongated, having a length to width aspect ratio of at least 5 to 1. Inone embodiment, where a composite comprises a meltable outer textile, athermally stable textile backer or a thermally stable convective barrierand heat reactive material comprising a polymer resin-expandablegraphite mixture applied in a pattern of discontinuous forms, the heatreactive material expands forming tendrils that are loosely packed afterexpansion creating voids between the tendrils, as well as space betweenthe pattern of the expanded polymer resin-expandable mixture. Uponexposure to flame, the meltable outer textile melts and generally movesaway from the open areas between the discontinuous forms of the heatreactive material. The thermally stable textile backer (or convectivebarrier) supports the heat reactive material during expansion and themelt of the meltable outer textile is absorbed and retained by theexpanding heat reactive material during melting. By absorbing andretaining the melt, composites can be formed that exhibit nomelt-dripping and flammability is suppressed. It is believed that wherethe thermally stable textile backer (or convective barrier) supports theexpanding material during melt absorption, the thermally stable textilebacker (or convective barrier) is protected from breaking open and holeformation. The increased surface area of the heat reactive material uponexpansion allows for absorption of the melt from the meltable textile bythe expanded heat reactive material upon exposure to flame.

The polymer resin-expandable graphite mixture may be produced by amethod that provides an intimate blend of polymer resin and expandablegraphite, without causing substantial expansion of the expandablegraphite. Suitable mixing methods include but not limited to paddlemixer, blending and other low shear mixing techniques. In one method,the intimate blend of polymer resin and expandable graphite particles isachieved by mixing the expandable graphite with a monomer or prepolymerprior to polymerization of the polymer resin. In another method, theexpandable graphite may be blended with a dissolved polymer, wherein thesolvent is removed after mixing. In another method, expandable graphiteis blended with a hot melt polymer at a temperature below the expansiontemperature of the graphite and above the melting temperature of thepolymer. In methods which provide an intimate blend of polymer resin andexpandable graphite particles or agglomerates of expandable graphite,the expandable graphite is coated or encapsulated by the polymer resinprior to expansion of the graphite. In other embodiments, the intimateblend is achieved prior to applying the polymer resin-expandablegraphite mixture to a substrate.

The polymer resin-expandable graphite mixture comprises less than orequal to about 50 wt %, or less than or equal to about 40 wt %, or lessthan or equal to about 30 wt % expandable graphite based on the totalweight of the polymer resin-expandable graphite mixture, and the balancesubstantially comprising the polymer resin. In other embodiments, theexpandable graphite comprises less than or equal to about 20 wt %, orless than or equal to about 10 wt %, or less than or equal to about 5 wt% of the mixture, and the balance substantially comprising the polymerresin. Generally, from about 5 wt % to 50 wt % of expandable graphitebased on the total weight of the polymer resin-expandable graphitemixture, is desired. In some embodiments, desirable flame resistanceperformance may be achieved with even lower amounts of expandablegraphite. Loadings as low as 1% may be useful. Depending on theproperties desired and the construction of the resulting textilecomposites, other levels of expandable graphite may also be suitable forother embodiments. Other additives such as pigments, fillers,antimicrobials, processing aids and stabilizers may also be added to themixture.

The polymer resin-expandable graphite mixture may be applied to theouter textile (10) of the textile composite to form the heat reactivematerial (20) such as exemplified in FIG. 1. The heat reactive materialmay be applied as a continuous layer. However, where enhancedbreathability and/or hand is desired, the polymer resin-expandablegraphite mixture may be applied discontinuously to form a layer of heatreactive material having less than 100% surface coverage.

A discontinuous application may provide less than 100% surface coverageby forms including but not limited to dots, grids, lines, andcombinations thereof. In some embodiments with discontinuous coverage,the average distance between adjacent areas of the discontinuous patternis less than the size of an impinging flame. In some embodiment withdiscontinuous coverage, the average distance between adjacent areas ofthe discontinuous pattern is less than 10 mm, or less than 5 mm, orpreferably less than 3.5 mm, or 2.5 mm or less, or 1.5 mm or less, or0.5 mm or less. For example, in a dot pattern printed onto a substrate,the spacing between the dots would be measured. An average distancebetween adjacent areas of the discontinuous pattern may be greater than40 um, or greater than 50 um, or greater than 100 um, or greater than200 um, depending on the application. Average dot spacing measured to begreater than 200 μm and less than 500 μm is useful in some compositesdescribed herein.

Pitch may also be used, for example, in combination with surfacecoverage as a way to described the laydown of a printed pattern. Ingeneral, pitch is defined as the average center-to-center distancesbetween adjacent forms such as dots, lines, or gridlines of the printedpattern. The average is used, for example, to account for irregularlyspaced printed patterns, such as shown in FIGS. 9b and 9c . In oneembodiment, the polymer resin-expandable graphite mixture (20) can beapplied discontinuously in a pattern with a pitch and surface coveragethat provides superior flame retardant performance compared to acontinuous application of heat reactive mixture having a laydown ofequivalent weight of the polymer resin-expandable graphite mixture. Forexample, as shown in FIGS. 9a, 9b, and 9c , the pitch is defined as theaverage of the center-to-center distances (101 and 102) between adjacentdots or grid lines. In some embodiments, the pitch is greater than 500μm, or greater than 1000 μm, or greater than 2000 μm, or greater than5000 μm. A pattern of heat reactive material having a pitch between 500μm and 6000 μm is suitable for use in most composites described herein.

In embodiments where properties such as hand, breathability, and/ortextile weight are important, a surface coverage of greater than about25%, and less than about 90%, or less than about 80%, or less than about70%, or less than about 60%, or less than about 50%, or less than about40%, or less than about 30% may be used. In certain embodiments where,for example, greater flame resistant properties are needed, it may bedesired to have a surface coverage between about 30% and 80% of the heatreactive material on a surface of a composite layer with pitch between500 μm and 6000 μm.

One method for achieving a coverage of less than 100% comprises applyingthe polymer resin-expandable graphite mixture by printing the mixtureonto a surface of the construct by, for example gravure printing. FIGS.5a and 5b illustrate examples in which the layer of heat reactivematerial (20) is provided in patterns of dots (5A) and grids (5B) as thepolymer resin-expandable graphite mixture (20) is applieddiscontinuously to form a heat reactive material, for example to asubstrate (10) such as a thermally stable convective barrier or to theinner side of an outer textile. The polymer resin-expandable graphitemixture may be applied to achieve an add-on weight of between about 10gsm to about 100 gsm of the mixture. In some embodiments, the mixture isapplied to the substrate to achieve an add-on weight of less than 100gsm, or less than 75 gsm, or less than 50 gsm, or less than 25 gsm.

In one discontinuous application, such as in the application of discretedots (20) in FIG. 5A, the polymer resin-expandable graphite mixture isapplied to a substrate forming a layer of heat reactive material (20) inthe form of a multiplicity of discrete pre-expansion structurescomprising the polymer resin-expandable graphite mixture. Uponexpansion, the discrete dots form a multiplicity of discrete expandedstructures having structural integrity thereby providing sufficientprotection to a textile composite to achieve the enhanced propertiesdescribed herein. By structural integrity it is meant that the heatreactive material after expansion withstands flexing or bending withoutsubstantially disintegrating or flaking off the substrate, andwithstands compression upon thickness measurement when measuredaccording to the Thickness Change Test described herein.

The polymer resin-expandable graphite mixture may be applied in otherforms in addition to dots, lines, or grids. Other methods for applyingthe polymer resin-expandable graphite mixture may include screenprinting, or spray or scatter coating or knife coating, provided thepolymer resin-expandable graphite mixture may be applied in a manner inwhich the desired properties upon exposure to heat or flame areachieved.

In one embodiment comprising a thermally stable convective barrier, asexemplified in FIG. 2, the layer of heat reactive material (20) may bedisposed on the outer textile (10) or on the thermally stable convectivebarrier (30). In one preferred method, the polymer resin-expandablegraphite mixture is applied in a manner in which the mixture provides agood bond between the thermally stable convective barrier and the outertextile. In embodiments where the textile composite comprises a laminateconstruction, the polymer resin-expandable graphite mixture is appliedas an adhesive, for example, to bond the inner side of outer textilelayer (10) and the thermally stable convective barrier (30) forming alayer of heat reactive material between the outer textile layer (10) andthe thermally stable convective barrier (30). In another method, thepolymer resin-expandable graphite mixture is applied to the compositeforming a layer of heat reactive material which may optionally bedisposed at least partially within surface pores or surface voids of oneor both of the layers (10 and 30).

The methods described provide enhanced properties which are particularlybeneficial to textile composites comprising an outer textile (10) whichcomprises materials comprising non-flammable meltable materials orflammable meltable materials. Meltable materials are materials that aremeltable when tested according to the Melting and Thermal Stabilitytest. Materials are tested with the Vertical Flame Test for Textiles todetermine whether they are flammable or nonflammable. In certainembodiments, the outer textile comprises a polyamide such as nylon 6 ornylon 6,6, and polyester, polyethylene, and combinations thereof.Preferred textile composites are comprised of outer textiles which areknit or woven, and the outer textile has a weight of less than or equalto about 10.0 oz/yd², preferably between 1 oz/yd² and 10 oz/yd².Alternately, the outer textile weight is between 1 oz/yd² and 5.0oz/yd².

Meltable non-flammable textiles include, for example, phosphinatemodified polyester (such as materials sold under the trade name Trevira®CS and Avora® FR). Some meltable, non-flammable textile are nottypically intended for use in flame resistant laminates intended forgarment applications, because when constrained in traditional laminateform, the textile cannot readily shrink away from flames resulting incontinued burning. However, it has been found that when formed as atextile composite further comprising a thermally stable textile orthermally stable convective barrier and a heat reactive material betweenthe layers, the textile composites are suitable for use in flameresistant laminate applications. In one embodiment, a textile compositein the form of a laminate comprising a meltable, non-flammable outertextile, and a thermally stable textile or thermally stable convectivebarrier that comprises a discontinuous pattern of heat reactive materialbetween the layers, has an afterflame less than 5 seconds, char lengthless than 10 cm, when tested according to the Edge Ignition Test.

Thermally stable convective barrier materials may be provided to thetextile composite to further enhance the performance of the textilecomposite upon exposure to flame or heat. In some embodiments, athermally stable convective barrier having a thickness of less than 1 mmand a hand less than 100, when measured by the Flexibility or HandMeasurement Test described herein, may be selected to achieve aparticular thinness and hand of the resulting composite. Thermallystable convective barrier materials comprise materials such as a heatstable film, and include materials such as polyimide, silicone, PTFE,such as dense PTFE or expanded PTFE. The thermally stable convectivebarrier prevents the convective heat transfer to the layers behind itwhen exposed to a convective heat source. In addition, the thermallystable textile and the thermally stable convective barrier facilitatesmelt absorption. Barrier materials not suitable for use in compositesdescribed herein include films lacking sufficient thermal stability,such as many breathable polyurethane films and breathable polyesterfilms (such as Sympatex®, particularly thermoplastics). Convectivebarriers for use in embodiments described herein have a maximum airpermeability of less than about 5 Frazier after thermal exposure whentested as per the Convective Barrier Thermal Stability Test methoddescribed herein. Preferably, a convective barrier has an airpermeability after thermal exposure of less than 3 Frazier.

Textile composites made according to the methods described hereinpreferably have an MVTR greater than about 1000, or greater than about3000, or greater than about 5000, or greater than about 7000, or greaterthan about 9000, or greater than about 10000, or higher. Preferredtextile composites have a break open time greater than about 50 seconds,greater than about 60 seconds, or even greater than 120 seconds whentested according to the methods for Horizontal Flame Test describedherein. Preferable textile composites also have an afterflame less than20 seconds when tested according to the Horizontal Flame Test andSelf-Extinguishing Test methods described herein. Further preferredtextile composites have an afterflame less than 15 seconds, or less than10 seconds, or less than 5 seconds, when tested by the Horizontal FlameTest and Self-Extinguishing Test. Preferred textile composites exhibitsubstantially no melt dripping behavior when tested in the HorizontalFlame test.

A flexible textile composite is a composite that is suitable forexample, in apparel or garment applications, such as protectivecoveralls, hazardous material suits, jackets and gloves, and tents.Flexible textile composites for use in garments, for example, can bemade having a Hand less than 2000, when measured according to the testdescribed herein for Flexibility or Hand Measurement. In otherembodiments, a textile composite is formed according to the methodsdescribed herein, having a hand less than about 500, or less than 300,or less than about 250, or less than about 200, and having an afterflameof less than about 20 seconds, or less than about 15 seconds or lessthan about 10 seconds, or an after-flame of about zero, when measuredaccording to the tests described herein for Flexibility and Hand, andHorizontal Flame Test and Self-Extinguishing Test. In one embodiment, atextile composite is formed that has an afterflame of less than 20seconds and a char length of less than 20 cm when tested by the EdgeIgnition Test. In another embodiment, a textile composite is formedhaving an afterflame of less than 20 seconds and have no hole formationwhen tested by the Surface Impingement FlameTest described herein. Insome embodiments, lightweight textile composites are formed having aweight of about less than 15 oz/yd², or less than about 10 oz/yd², orless than about 8 oz/yd², or less than about 5 oz/yd².

In some embodiments, textile composites are made according to methodsdescribed herein having the ability to suppress afterflame even whencontaminated with flammable liquid contaminants, such as oils, fuels, orhydrocarbon-based solvents. In one embodiment, a textile compositehaving a meltable outer textile is formed that when contaminated withflammable liquid contaminant has an afterflame of less than 10 seconds,no hole formation, or both, when tested according to the SurfaceImpingement Flame Test described herein. In another embodiment, acomposite having a meltable, flammable outer textile is formed that hasan afterflame of less than 5 seconds, or less than 2 seconds aftercontamination by flammable liquid. It is believed that the meltabsorption property of meltable textile composites of this inventionleads to afterflame suppression in a meltable textile compositecontaminated by flammable liquid. Without wishing to be bound by theory,it is believed that the meltable textile adsorbs the flammable liquidand carries it into the expanding heat reactive material, therebyleading to suppression of afterflame.

In an embodiment of the current invention, the meltable materials, forexample an outer textile (10), described may combine with the expandingheat reactive material (20) during exposure to heat and/or flame that issufficient to melt the meltable materials to form an expanded composite.In some embodiments, the meltable material may be sufficiently drawninto or absorbed on at least a portion of the expanding heat reactivematerial. The resulting expanded composite may comprise the elongatedtendrils of the heat reactive material and the meltable material. Insome embodiments, the expanded composite has structural stability whentested in accordance to the Thickness Change Test. In one embodiment,the textile composite of the present invention changes thickness uponheat exposure. The thickness of the textile composite after expansion isat least 1 mm greater than the thickness of the textile composite priorto expansion.

In one embodiment, a material is described that is suitable for use ingarments for workers in hazardous environments, which is breathable,waterproof, and flame resistant, while being lightweight, flexible, andcomfortable to wear.

Without intending to limit the scope of the present invention, thefollowing examples illustrate how the present invention may be made andused:

Test Methods

Horizontal Flame Test

This test is modeled generally after MIL-C 83429B. A 75 mm by 250 mmtextile composite sample (3 inch by 10 inch) was clamped in a steelfixture (400 mm long by 75 mm wide with a center window of about 350 mmlong and 50 mm wide) using binder clips. The sample was clamped in amanner that secured the edges of the textile composite withoutobstructing the area of textile composite present in the window of thesteel clamping fixture. The sample in fixture was placed horizontally ata height of about 40 mm in a 90 mm flame (based on butane at 2 psi usinga Meeke burner). FIG. 7 depicts the orientation of the textile compositeconstruction 2, wherein the meltable outer textile 10 is orientedadjacent to the flame 70 during testing. The sample is exposed to theflame and the time is recorded until the convective barrier breaks open(or a hole forms in the face textile in case where convective barrier isnot used), either by cracking or the formation of a hole, and light fromthe flame is evident when viewing through the crack or opening in thematerial. The sample is subsequently removed from the flame. The timerecorded is referred to as the horizontal flame break open time. Thesample is observed for melt dripping or falling droplets. A textilecomposite is considered as having “no melt-drip” when no fallingdroplets of melted material is observed during or after the completionof the test.

Self-Extinguishing Test

After the material sample is removed from the flame in the HorizontalFlame Test, above, the material is observed for any afterflame andafterflame time is recorded. If the sample exhibits any melt dripping orfalling droplets, it is also recorded. If no afterflame is observed, orif an afterflame is observed upon removal but extinguishes within five(5) seconds after removal from the flame, the material is said to beself-extinguishing.

Vertical Flame Test for Textiles

Outer textile material samples were tested in accordance with ASTM D6413test standard. Samples were exposed to flame for 12-seconds. Afterflametime was averaged for three (3) samples. Textiles with afterflame ofgreater than two (2) seconds were considered as flammable. Textileshaving an afterflame of less than two (2) seconds are considerednon-flammable.

Edge Ignition Test

Samples of textiles and textile composites were tested in accordancewith ASTM D6413 test standard. Samples were exposed to flame for 12seconds. Afterflame time and char length for an average of five (5)samples were recorded. A textile composite is considered as having “nomelt-drip” when no falling droplets or melt dripping is observed duringor after the completion of the test.

Surface Impingement Flame Test

The test is based on CAN/CGSB-4.2 test standard titled “FlameResistance—Vertically Oriented Textile Fabric or Fabric Assembly Test”.One modification to the test equipment was that the burner angle was 45degrees to the vertical. The flame was impinged on the surface of theouter textile of the sample for 12 seconds and the sample was observedfor the afterflame time, melt dripping, and evidence of hole formationin the sample. Reported results were the average of 3 samples.

Flammable Liquid Contamination Procedure

A textile composite sample measuring approximately (8 in×8 in) wasplaced on a flat horizontal surface with the outer meltable textilefacing up. A pipette was used to evenly deposit approximately 15 dropsof a flammable liquid contaminant in a center rectangular area measuringapproximately 1 in×4 in. In this application, SAE 15W-40 motor oil(Mobil Delvac 1300 Super) was used. A (6 in×6 in) glass plate was placedover the contaminated area of the sample and a 3 lb weight was placed onthe center of the glass plate. After 2 hours, the weight and the glassplate were removed. A test sample for testing as per Surface ImpingementFlame Test was cut so that the majority of the contaminated area wascontained in this sample.

Garment Flammability Test Method

Test garments were evaluated for resistance to a simulated flash fireexposure employing procedures similar to ASTM F 1930-00 Standard TestMethod for Evaluation of Flame Resistant Clothing for Protection AgainstFlash Fire Simulations Using an Instrumented Manikin. Prior to testing,a nude manikin calibration was done with a four seconds exposure. Aftercalibration, a cotton t-shirt (size 42 regular, weighing between 4oz/yd² and 7 oz/yd²) and a cotton short (size M) were put on followed bythe jacket made of laminates described below (size 42 regular). In sometests, approximately 7.5 oz/yd², size 42 regular middle layer ofclothing was put on the manikin between the cotton base layer and outergarment of this invention. After dressing the manikin, a sophisticatedcomputer system was used to control the test procedure, to include thelighting of pilot flames, exposing the test garment to the flash fire,acquisition of data for 120-seconds, followed by running the exhaustfans to vent the chamber. Data acquired by the system was used tocalculate the incident heat flux, predicted burn injury for each sensorduring and after the exposure, and produce a report and graphics foreach test. Any continued flaming after exposure was noted, andafterflame and melt dripping or falling of droplets was also noted. Thepredicted burn injury data along with afterflame and melt drippingobservations is reported in Table 3. The predicted burn injury iscalculated by dividing the total number of sensors that reach 2^(nd) and3^(rd) degree burn by the number of sensors in the area covered by thetest garment. The total percent body burn reported is the sum of the2^(nd) and 3^(rd) degree predicted burn injury percentages.

Melting and Thermal Stability Test

The test was used to determine the thermal stability of textilematerials. This test is based on thermal stability test as described insection 8.3 of NFPA 1975, 2004 Edition. The test oven was a hot aircirculating oven as specified in ISO 17493. The test was conductedaccording to ASTM D 751, Standard Test Methods for Coated Fabrics, usingthe Procedures for Blocking Resistance at Elevated Temperatures(Sections 89 to 93), with the following modifications:

-   -   Borosilicate glass plates measuring 100 mm×100 mm×3 mm (4 in.×4        in.×⅛ in.) were used.    -   A test temperature of 265° C., +3/−0° C. (510° F., +5/−0° F.)        was used.

The specimens were allowed to cool a minimum of 1 hour after removal ofthe glass plates from the oven.

Any sample side sticking to glass plate, sticking to itself whenunfolded, or showing evidence of melting or dripping was considered asmeltable. Any sample lacking evidence of meltable side was considered asthermally stable.

Moisture Vapor Transmission Rate (MVTR)

A description of the test employed to measure moisture vaportransmission rate (MVTR) is given below. The procedure has been found tobe suitable for testing films, coatings, and coated products.

In the procedure, approximately 70 ml of a solution consisting of 35parts by weight of potassium acetate and 15 parts by weight of distilledwater was placed into a 133 ml polypropylene cup, having an insidediameter of 6.5 cm at its mouth. An expanded polytetrafluoroethylene(PTFE) membrane having a minimum MVTR of approximately 85,000 g/m²/24hrs. as tested by the method described in U.S. Pat. No. 4,862,730 (toCrosby), was heat sealed to the lip of the cup to create a taut, leakproof, microporous barrier containing the solution.

A similar expanded PTFE membrane was mounted to the surface of a waterbath. The water bath assembly was controlled at 23° C. plus 0.2° C.,utilizing a temperature controlled room and a water circulating bath.

The sample to be tested was allowed to condition at a temperature of 23°C. and a relative humidity of 50% prior to performing the testprocedure. Samples were placed so the microporous polymeric membrane wasin contact with the expanded polytetrafluoroethylene membrane mounted tothe surface of the water bath and allowed to equilibrate for at least 15minutes prior to the introduction of the cup assembly.

The cup assembly was weighed to the nearest 1/1000 g and was placed inan inverted manner onto the center of the test sample.

Water transport was provided by the driving force between the water inthe water bath and the saturated salt solution providing water flux bydiffusion in that direction. The sample was tested for 15 minutes andthe cup assembly was then removed, weighed again within 1/1000 g.

The MVTR of the sample was calculated from the weight gain of the cupassembly and was expressed in grams of water per square meter of samplesurface area per 24 hours.

Weight

Weight measurements on materials were conducted as specified in ASTMD751, section 10.

Thickness Change Test

Samples were tested for initial thickness as per ASTM D751, section 9with the exception that the pressure foot diameter was 1″. Theinstrument was adjusted to apply a pressure force of approximately 3.4psi to the specimen. After exposure to Horizontal Flame Test for 60seconds (or after break-open if break-open occurred prior to 60seconds), the sample was remeasured for thickness change. Thickness andintegrity of the expanded structure were observed after testing.

Convective Barrier Thermal Stability Test (Air Permeability)

Preferably, a convective barrier has an air permeability after thermalexposure of less than 5 Frazier. To determine the thermal stability of aconvective barrier, a 381 mm (15 in.) square specimen was clamped in ametal frame and then suspended in a forced air-circulating oven at 260°C. (500° F.). Following a 5-minute exposure, the specimen was removedfrom the oven. Specimens either melt dripping or showing hole formationduring the oven exposure were not considered thermally stable convectivebarriers.

After allowing the specimen to cool down, the air permeability of thespecimen was tested according to test methods entitled ASTM D 737-75.“Standard Test Method for Air Permeability Of Textile Fabrics.”Specimens with less than 5 Frazier were considered as a thermally stableconvective barrier.

Thickness of Convective Barrier

Convective barrier thickness was measured by placing the membranebetween the two plates of a Kafer FZ1000/30 thickness snap gauge (KaferMessuhrenfabrik GmbH, Villingen-Schwenningen, Germany). The average ofthree measurements was used.

Density of Convective Barrier

Samples die cut to form rectangular sections 2.54 cm by 15.24 cm weremeasured to determine their mass (using a Mettler-Toledo analyticalbalance Model AG204) and their thickness (using a Kafer FZ1000/30 snapgauge). Using these data, density was calculated with the followingformula:

$\rho = \frac{m}{w*l*t}$in which: ρ=density (g/cc); m=mass (g); w=width (cm); l=length (cm); andt=thickness (cm). The average of the three measurements was used.TMA Expansion Test

TMA (Thermo-mechanical analysis) was used to measure the expansion ofexpandable graphite particles. Expansion was tested with TA InstrumentsTMA 2940 instrument. A ceramic (alumina) TGA pan, measuring roughly 8 mmin diameter and 12 mm in height was used for holding the sample. Usingthe macroexpansion probe, with a diameter of roughly 6 mm, the bottom ofthe pan was set the zero. Then flakes of expandable graphite (about 15mg) about 0.1-0.3 mm deep, as measured by the TMA probe, were put in thepan. The furnace was closed and initial sample height was measured. Thefurnace was heated from about 25° C. to 600° C. at a ramp rate of 10°C./min. The TMA probe displacement was plotted against temperature; thedisplacement was used as a measure of expansion.

Furnace Expansion Test

A nickel crucible was heated in a hot furnace at 300° C. for 2 minutes.A measured sample (about 0.5 g) of expandable graphite was added to thecrucible and placed in the hot furnace at 300° C. for 3 minutes. Afterthe heating period, the crucible was removed from the furnace andallowed to cool and then the expanded graphite was transferred to ameasuring cylinder to measure expanded volume. The expanded volume wasdivided by the initial weight of the sample to get expansion in cc/gunits.

Flexibility or Hand Measurement

Hand measurements of textile composite samples were obtained using aThwing-Albert Handle-o-meter, (model #211-5 from Thwing AlbertInstrument Company, Philadelphia, Pa.). Lower values indicate lower loadrequired to bend the samples and indicates more flexible sample.

DSC Endotherm Test

Tests were run on a Q2000 DSC from TA Instruments using Tzero™ hermeticpans. For each sample, about 3 mg of expandable graphite were placed inthe pan. The pan was vented by pressing the corner of a razor blade intothe center, creating a vent that was approximately 2 mm long and lessthan 1 mm wide. The DSC was equilibrated at 20° C. Samples were thenheated from 20° C. to 400° C. at 10° C./min. Endotherm values wereobtained from the DSC curves.

EXAMPLES

Thermally Stable Convective Barrier 1

Thermally Stable Convective Barrier 1 was constructed by treating ePTFEmembrane (0.3 micron average pore size and 0.3 g/cc density) with acoating comprised of a fluoroacrylate polymer and carbon black as taughtin U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2007/0009679.

Thermally Stable Convective Barrier 2

A thermally stable convective barrier 2 was constructed by treatingePTFE film having 0.3 micron pore size and 0.45 g/cc density with acontinuous, partially penetrated layer of 15 gsm of a breathable,moisture cured polyurethane in accordance with the teachings of U.S.Pat. No. 4,194,041. A second ePTFE membrane identical to the first wasbrought in contact with the polyurethane coated side of theaforementioned coated ePTFE and combined in a nip to form atri-component ePTFE film. The film was partially cured in oven and thenallowed to fully cure on a cardboard core at about >50% RH for 7 days

Thermally Stable Convective Barrier 3

A barrier material was made according to the method of commonly ownedU.S. Pat. No. 5,418,054A. Two layers of porous expandedpolytetrafluoroethylene were laminated together by a flame-retardantadhesive layer of poly(urea-urethane) polymer containing phosphorusester groups built into the chains of the polymer in about 12 gsmlaydown. The resultant thermally stable convective barrier weighed about46 gsm.

Polymer Resin (PR) 1

A flame retardant polyurethane resin was prepared by first forming aresin in accordance with the examples of commonly owned U.S. Pat. No.4,532,316, and adding in the reactor a phosphorus-based additive(Antiblaze PR82) in an amount of about 20% by weight.

Polymer Resin (PR) 2

A flame retardant polyurethane resin was prepared by first forming aresin in accordance with the examples of commonly owned U.S. Pat. No.4,532,316, and adding in the reactor a phosphorus-based additive in anamount of about 28% to get about 3% elemental phosphorus content byweight of the total resin mixture.

Polymer Resin-Expandable Graphite Mixture 1

A mixture of a polymer resin and expandable graphite was prepared bymixing about 20 gm of an expandable graphite (Grade 3626 from AsburyGraphite Mills, Inc having an expansion of greater than 900 μm uponheating to 280° C.) to about 80 gm of Polymer Resin (PR) 1. Mixing ofexpandable graphite flakes into the polymer resin was carried out atabout 100° C. using a low shear hand mixer for at least 1 minute toensure uniform dispersion.

Polymer Resin-Expandable Graphite Mixture 2

A mixture of polymer resin and expandable graphite was prepared bymixing about 5 gm of an expandable graphite (Grade 3626 from AsburyGraphite Mills, Inc) to about 95 gm of PR 1. Mixing was carried out asdescribed above.

Polymer Resin-Expandable Graphite Mixture 3

A polymer resin prepared in accordance with U.S. Pat. No. 4,532,316.About 20 gm of an expandable graphite (Grade 3626 from Asbury GraphiteMills, Inc) was added to about 80 gm of polymer resin to get polymerresin-expandable graphite mixture 3. Mixing was carried out as describedabove.

Polymer Resin-Expandable Graphite Mixture 4

A polymer resin prepared in accordance with U.S. Pat. No. 4,532,316.About 20 gm of an expandable graphite (Grade Nyagraph 351 having anexpansion of greater than 900 μm upon heating to 280° C. available fromNyacol Nano technologies, Inc., Ashland, Mass.) was added to about 80 gmof polymer resin to get polymer resin-expandable graphite mixture 4.Mixing was carried out as described above.

Polymer Resin—Ammonium Polyphosphate Mixture

A mixture was prepared by adding about 20 gm of ammonium polyphosphate(FR CROS C30 available from Flame Chk, Inc.) to about 80 gm of PR1.Mixing was carried out as described above.

Polymer Resin—Three Component Intumescent

A mixture was prepared by adding about 20 gm of commercially availablethree component chemical intumescent (Budit 3076 available fromFlameChk, Inc.) to about 80 gm of PR1. Mixing was carried out asdescribed above.

Polymer Resin-Expandable Graphite Mixture 5

A mixture was prepared by adding about 20 gm of expandable graphite(grade 3538 from Asbury Graphite Mills, Inc., having an expansion ofless than 900 μm at 280° C.) to about 80 gm of PR1. Mixing was carriedout as described above.

Waterproof Film 1

A commercially available waterproof breathable monolithic thermoplasticpolyurethane film sold by Omniflex (Greenfield, Mass.) under part number1540 was used.

Fabric Example 1

A textile comprising heat reactive material was prepared as follows. A130 gsm nylon 6,6 knit outer textile (10) from Milliken Corporation,Spartanburg, S.C. (STYLE 755133) was coated with discrete dots of thepolymer resin-expandable graphite mixture 1 by a gravure roller (atabout 100° C. with a pressure of about 40 psi) in such a manner as toprovide coverage of approximately 32 percent on the surface of thefabric, with a laydown of about 35 grams per square meter (gsm). Thegravure roll had a round dot pattern with a cell depth about 1200 um,cell opening of about 2500 um, and a spacing of about 2500 um.

The coated fabric was allowed to cure at 50% RH and 23° C. for 48 hours.

Samples of the textile coated with the polymer resin-graphite mixture 1were tested as per self extinguishing test described herein recorded anafterflame of less than 5 seconds.

Laminate Example 1

A laminate was made using a 95 gsm nylon 6,6 plain weave outer textilefrom Milliken (part number 131967) and thermally stable convectivebarrier 1, substantially as depicted in FIG. 2. The laminate wasconstructed by printing discrete dots of the Polymer Resin—ExpandableGraphite Mixture 1 onto thermally stable convective barrier 1 and thenadhering the 95 gsm nylon woven outer textile to the thermally stableconvective barrier using a nip pressure of about 30 psi. The discretedots of heat reactive material (20) were printed by a gravure roller asdescribed above.

The resultant laminate was a two layer laminate of a thermally stableconvective barrier and a nylon woven meltable outer textile layer bondedby dots of polymer resin-expandable graphite mixture 1. The laminate wastaken up onto a steel drum under tension and allowed to cure for about48 hours at greater than about 50% relative humidity.

Samples were tested according to MVTR, Horizontal Flame Test andSelf-Extinguishing Test methods, described herein and reported in Table1.

Laminate Example 2

A two layer laminate was made substantially according to Example 1,except that thermally stable convective barrier 2, described above, wasused in place of thermally stable convective barrier 1

Samples were tested according to the Horizontal Flame Test andSelf-Extinguishing Test methods, described herein and reported in Table1.

Laminate Example 3

A laminate was prepared substantially as depicted in FIG. 4, and wasmade using a 130 gsm nylon 6,6 circular knit outer textile (10) fromMilliken Corporation, Spartanburg, S.C. (STYLE 755133), and thermallystable convective barrier 1 (30). The laminate was constructed byprinting discrete dots of polymer resin-expandable graphite mixture 1onto the thermally stable convective barrier 1 (30) then adhering 130gsm nylon 6,6 circular knit outer textile (10) to the thermally stableconvective barrier 1 (30) using a nip. The gravure lamination processwas carried out as described in laminate example 1. The resultantlaminate was a two layer laminate of a thermally stable convectivebarrier and a nylon knit meltable face textile layer bonded by dots ofpolymer resin-expandable graphite mixture. The laminate was taken uponto a steel drum under tension and allowed to cure for about 48 hoursat greater than about 50% relative humidity

Samples were tested according to the Horizontal Flame Test andSelf-Extinguishing Test methods, described herein and reported in Table1.

Laminate Example 4

A laminate made substantially according to Example 3 was provided andPR1 was applied in a discrete dot pattern (about 15 gsm) to the exposedside of the thermally stable convective barrier (the side opposite thenylon woven textile), as depicted in FIG. 4. A 60 gsm aramid knit backertextile (50) (Part No. KRDZ602 from SSM Industries) was then adhered tothe two layer laminate by feeding the two layer laminate with the PR1dots and the aramid backer through an additional nip to form a threelayer laminate. The three layer laminate was then taken up onto a steeldrum under tension and allowed to cure for about 48 hours at greaterthan about 50% relative humidity.

Samples were tested according to the Horizontal Flame Test andSelf-Extinguishing Test methods, described herein and reported inTable 1. Samples were also tested for flexibility as per hand test andshowed good flexibility with hand result of 192.

Laminate Example 5

A three layer laminate was prepared substantially in accordance withExample 4, except that a 109 gsm Modacrylic/Cotton knit fabric (Part No.05289 from United Knitting) was used as backer textile instead of thearamid knit backer textile.

Samples were tested according to the Horizontal Flame Test andSelf-Extinguishing Test methods, described herein and reported in Table1.

Laminate Example 6

A three layer laminate was made substantially in accordance with Example4, except that a 80 gsm Polyester woven (Part No. US101 from MillikenCorporation) was used as the outer textile instead of a 130 gsm nylon6,6 knit outer textile.

Laminate Example 7

A two layer laminate was prepared substantially in accordance withExample 2, except that Polymer resin-Expandable Graphite Mixture 2 wasused instead of Polymer resin-Expandable Graphite Mixture 1.

Laminate Example 8

A two layer laminate was prepared substantially in accordance withExample 3, except that gravure roll print covered approximately 89% ofthermally stable convective barrier 1 and Polymer resin—ExpandableGraphite Mixture 4 was used.

Laminate Example 9

A three layer laminate was prepared substantially in accordance withExample 4, except that Polymer resin-Expandable Graphite 3 was used.

As shown in Table 1, the test results on Laminate Examples 1 through 9show the present invention may achieve improved break-open time,substantially no after-flame, no melt dripping while providing goodmoisture vapor transmission rates. Additional examples described belowwere created to further explore the effect of laminate constructions andmaterials.

Example 10

A laminate was made using a 95 gsm nylon 6,6 plain weave outer textilefrom Milliken (part number 131967), and thermally stable convectivebarrier 1. The laminate was constructed by printing discrete dots of PR1onto the thermally stable convective barrier 2 then adhering the 95 gsmnylon outer textile to the thermally stable convective barrier using anip. The resultant laminate created was a two layer laminate of thethermally stable convective barrier (30) and the nylon woven meltableouter textile (10) bonded by PR1 (40). The laminate was taken up onto asteel drum under tension and allowed to cure for about 48 hours atgreater than about 50% relative humidity.

Samples were tested according to the Horizontal Flame Test andSelf-Extinguishing Test methods, described herein and reported in Table1.

Example 11

A laminate was constructed in same manner as the laminate of Example 4,except that Polymer Resin-Ammonium Polyphosphate Mixture was used inplace of active insulative material 1 when forming the two layerlaminate portion of the three layer laminate.

Samples were tested according to the Horizontal Flame Test andSelf-Extinguishing Test methods, described herein and reported in Table1.

Example 12

A laminate was constructed in same manner as the laminate of Example 4,except that Polymer Resin-Three Component Intumescent Mixture was usedinstead of Polymer resin-Expandable Graphite Mixture 1 when forming thetwo layer laminate.

Samples were tested according to the Horizontal Flame Test andSelf-Extinguishing Test methods, described herein and reported inTable 1. Samples were also tested for flexibility and hand valueobtained was 198.

Example 13

A laminate was constructed in same manner as the laminate of Example 4,except that Polymer resin-Expandable Graphite Mixture 5 was used insteadof Polymer resin-Expandable graphite Mixture 1 for making the two layerlaminate portion of the three layer laminate.

Samples were tested according to the Horizontal Flame Test andSelf-Extinguishing Test methods, described herein and reported inTable 1. Samples were also tested for flexibility and hand valueobtained was 171.

Example 14

A laminate was constructed in same manner as Example 3, except that awaterproof breathable polyurethane film was used in place of thermallystable convective barrier 1. A commercially available breathablemonolithic thermoplastic polyurethane film sold by Omniflex (Greenfield,Mass.) under part number 1540 was used.

Samples were tested according to the Horizontal Flame Test andSelf-Extinguishing Test methods, described herein and reported in Table1.

Example 15

As depicted in FIG. 8, discrete dots of Polymer resin-Expandablegraphite Mixture 1 (20) were printed on the exposed side of thermallystable convective barrier 1 (30′) of example 10. An additional layer ofthermally stable convective barrier 1 (30″) was adhered to theconvective barrier side of the two layer laminate by bringing the layerstogether in a nip. The gravure lamination was carried out substantiallyin the same manner as described in laminate example 1. The resultingexposed side of the second convective barrier 1 (30″) was printed withdiscrete dots of PR1 (40) and adhered to 60 gsm Aramid knit backertextile (50). The resultant laminate was a four layer laminate which wasallowed to cure for about 48 hours at greater than about 50% relativehumidity.

Samples were tested according to the Horizontal Flame Test andSelf-Extinguishing Test methods, described herein and reported in Table1.

Example 16

A three layer laminate was prepared substantially according to thelaminate of Example 4, except that PR1 was used to prepare the two layerlaminate portion of the three layer laminate, while polymerresin-expandable graphite mixture 1 was used to convert 2 L into 3 Llaminate.

TABLE 1 Break Open After- Laydown MVTR Time Flame* Melt Sample (oz/yd2)(g/m2/day) (sec) (sec) Drip Laminate Example 1 1.2 >8000 >120 0 NoLaminate Example 10 — >10000 6 20* Yes Laminate Example 2 1.0 >7600 >1200 No Laminate Example 3 — >9300 >120 0 No Laminate Example 11 1.3 >750021 20* — Laminate Example 12 1.3 >11500 22 20* — Laminate Example 130.9 >9500 31 20* — Laminate Example 14 — — 3 20* — Laminate Example 15— >7500 27 20* Yes Laminate Example 16 — — — 20* — Laminate Example 41.0 >8900 >120 0 No Laminate Example 5 1.0 >10300 >120 0 No LaminateExample 6 — — >60 0 No Laminate Example 7 — — >120 0 No Laminate Example8 1.4 >7800 >120 0 No Laminate Example 9 0.9 >9400 >120 0 No *Samplecontinued to burn and had to be extinguished.

Examples 17 Through 20

A series of examples were prepared using an alternate method. First atwo layer laminate substantially comprising an ePTFE film and a 20 gramsper square meter melt blown polyester non-woven was obtained from W. L.Gore and Associates, Inc. under part number NASZ100000C.

Next, a series of three layer laminates were constructed by laminatingthe two-layer laminate (NASZ100000C) to a second non-woven using ameltable adhesive web (part number PE2900 from Spufab, Ltd. CuyahogaFalls, Ohio). The composition of each laminate made in accordance withthis example is presented in Table 2. All of the three-layer laminateswere produced in the following manner.

An amount of expandable graphite as indicated in the Table 2 was weighedand distributed evenly on the ePTFE surface of the two-layer laminate.An adhesive web weighing approximately 17 gsm was placed on top of theexpandable graphite that was distributed on the two layer laminate. Asecond non-woven was placed over the adhesive web. Heat and pressurewere applied to fuse the layers together at a temperature in excess ofthe adhesive melt temperature but below the expansion temperature of thegraphite, approximately 163° C. and 40 psi for 15 seconds.

The Examples were tested for break-open time and after-flame timeaccording to the methods described above. Comparison of Example 17 withExamples 18 and 19 shows the addition of expandable graphite has animproved break-open time; however, after-flame and melt dripping areinferior to Laminate Examples 1 through 9. The effect of constructionmethod and materials is shown by comparison of Example 20 with LaminateExample 8. Both Example 20 and Laminate Example 8 have substantially thesame lay down weight of the substantially the same expandable graphite;Laminate Example 8 has a longer break-open time, shorter after-flame,and no melt dripping.

TABLE 2 Expandable Second Break- After- Ex- Graphite Non- Open flameample Expandable Laydown woven Time Time Melt No. Graphite (gsm) (Face)(sec) (sec) Dripping 17 None 0 Nylon 6 20* Yes 18 ES100C10¹ 4 Nylon 820* Yes 19 ES100C10¹ 8.5 Nylon 8.5 20* Yes 20 Nyagraph 351² 8.5 Nylon 1420* Yes 20* indicates that the flame had to be extinguished ¹SourceES100C10—Graphit Kropfmahl AG ²Nyagraph 351—Nyacol Nano technologies,Inc Ashland, MA

Garment Flammability Tests on laminate jacket examples were conducted asper ASTM F1930-00 with heat flux of 2.0 cal/cm²-sec. Ensemble lay-up wascotton-T shirt (weighing about 4.5 oz/yd²) and shorts, NyCo (50/50nylon/cotton) shirt and pants (weighing about 7.5 oz/yd²), and thelaminate jacket.

TABLE 3 Total After- Ex- % 2^(ND) % 3^(rd) Percent flame ample SampleDegree Degree Body on Melt ID Description Burn Burn Burn (%) LaminateDripping 21 Laminate 9.7 27 37 >120 sec Yes Example 21 Jacket 22Laminate 0 0 0    1 sec No Example 4 Jacket 23 Laminate 1.4 0 1.4    4sec No Example 5 Jacket 24 Laminate 14 0 14    5 sec No Example 4 Jackettested without NyCo shirt and pants

Examples 21-24

Example Jacket 21 was constructed using a three layer PTFE laminate(Part Number EXSH100050AZ available from W. L. Gore and Associates,Inc.) and without heat reactive material, and having the same meltableouter textile. Example Jackets 22, 23 and 24 were prepared fromlaminates made substantially according to Example 4 and Example 5. Eachexample jacket was tested under the Garment Flammability Test Method(such as that available at the test labs at North Carolina StateUniversity called Pyroman test) for Garment Flammability described aboveaccording to ASTM F1930-00 with heat flux of 2.0 cal/cm2-sec, for 4second exposure as indicated in Table 3. Each example jacket wasprepared so that the face textile faced direct flame exposure. Becausejacket design may affect Garment Flammability Test performance, thejackets were designed so that zippers were covered from flame exposure.The Pyroman laminate jacket results shown in Table 3 indicate that thepresent invention may provide a percent body burn value that is 10percentage points lower than a substantially similar jacket without theheat reactive material. The percent body burn value may be 20 percentagepoints lower than a substantially similar jacket without the heatreactive material. The ensemble as described herein shows a totalpredicted body burn of less than 20%. The afterflame may also be reducedby at least 100 seconds. The afterflame is reduced by at least 60seconds. The afterflame is reduced by at least 30 seconds. Theafterflame is reduced by at least 20 seconds. The afterflame is reducedby at least 10 seconds.

Laminate Examples 25-31

Two layer laminates were prepared with several different expandablegraphites all having expansion greater than 9 cc/g, but having differentendotherms. Sample laminates were tested for afterflame and char length(tested according to the Edge Ignition Test for Composites. Graphiteexpansion was calculated according to the Furnace Expansion Test andendotherm was tested according to the DCS Endotherm Test for eachgraphite used, the results of which are reported in Table 4.

The samples of two layer laminates were prepared by the laminationtechnique as taught in Laminate Example 1 by printing discrete dots ofpolymer resin encapsulated expandable graphite on Thermally StableConvective Barrier 3 and then adhering a 70 gsm Nylon 6,6 plain weaveouter textile from Milliken (Style 130975) to Thermally StableConvective Barrier 3 with the dots of polymer resin encapsulatedexpandable graphite between the two layers. The polymer resin used inthese examples was PR2 and the expandable graphite materials shown inTable 4 were mixed in PR2 at 25 wt % level.

TABLE 4 Furnace Char Laminate Expandable Expansion Endotherm AfterflameLength Example Graphite ID (cc/g) (J/g) (s) (cm) 25 Nyagraph 26 48 26.728 200¹ 26 7814C⁴ 14 57 28.7 27.8 27 3626 19 65 24.9 26 28 Nyagraph 3078 25.6 25.0 801H¹ 29 Carbofoil 14 214 17.0 17.6 PU 90² 30 Grafguard 29250 1.4 5.8 160-80N³ 31 Carbofoil 22 267 0.72 8.1 PU 200² ¹Nyagraph 200and 801H (Nyacol Nano technologies, Inc Ashland, MA) ²Carbofoil PU-90and PU-200 (Metachem Manufacturing Company Pvt Ltd., Pune, India)³Grafguard 160-80N (Graftech Inc., Lakewood, OH) ⁴7814C (SuperiorGraphite, Chicago, IL)

As reported in Table 4, laminate samples of Examples 29-31 made withpolymer resin encapsulated expandable graphite having an endothermgreater than 100 J/g performed better in the Edge Ignition Test forComposites, having both shorter afterflame and char length, compared tolaminate samples of Examples 25-28, made with polymer resin encapsulatedexpandable graphite having an endotherm greater than 100 J/g. Samples oflaminates made with polymer resin encapsulated graphite having anendotherm greater than 100 J/g had an afterflame as low as less than onesecond (Example 31) and a char length less than 6 cm (Example 30),compared with laminate samples made with graphite having endotherms lessthan 100 J/g, having an afterflame as long as almost 29 seconds (Example26) and a char length as long as 28 cm (Example 25).

Laminate Examples 32-33

Laminates were constructed using gravures providing different surfacecoverages and tested for afterflame and hole formation.

Laminate 32 was constructed using a gravure having a discrete dotpattern, a surface coverage of 89% and pitch of 567 microns by applyingpolymer resin encapsulated expandable graphite mixture on ThermallyStable Convective Barrier 3. A nylon (70 gsm Nylon 6,6 plain weave)outer textile from Milliken (Style 130975) was adhered to the thermallystable convective barrier by the polymer resin encapsulated graphitemixture. Laminate 33 was constructed with the same components and methodbut using a gravure having discrete dot pattern, a surface coverage of51% and pitch of 2100 microns.

The polymer resin used in these examples was PR2. The expandablegraphite material was 7814C with a particle size between 90-150 microns,and was mixed in PR2 at 25 wt % level. Both Examples 32 and 33 laminateshad a laydown of polymer resin encapsulated expandable graphite mixtureof about 38 g/m².

When tested as per the Surface Impingement Test, even though bothlaminates had the same laydown of the polymer resin encapsulatedexpandable graphite mixture, Laminate 32 which had coverage over agreater surface area (89%) performed worse, exhibiting afterflame timeof greater than 30 seconds and also hole formation. Laminate 33, whichhad a surface coverage of only 51%, exhibited afterflame of less than 10seconds and without any hole formation.

Laminate Examples 34-36 and Fabric Example 2

Laminates were made with a meltable and non-flammable outer textile andtested according to the Edge Ignition test.

Laminates were constructed using a 4 oz/yd² plain weave textile madewith Trevira® CS yarns. Laminate 34 was constructed by printing discretedots of PR2 (with no expandable graphite) on Thermally Stable ConvectiveBarrier 3 and adhering the meltable, non-flammable fabric to the dots.Laminate 35 was constructed in the same manner as Laminate 34 exceptusing PR2 and 25 wt % of 7814C expandable graphite as the heat reactivematerial. Laminate 36 was constructed in the same manner as Laminate 33except using PR2 and 25 wt % of Grafguard 160-80N expandable graphite asthe heat reactive materials.

The laminates were tested as per the Edge Ignition flame test andresults are shown in Table 5 below. In a further comparison, the samemeltable, non-flammable Trevira® CS textile without being formed as alaminate and without polymer resin-expandable graphite mixture, and whentested as per Edge Ignition flame test showed less than 1 secondafterflame and 8.9 cm char length and no melt drip.

TABLE 5 Afterflame Time Char Length Example (second) (cm) Melt DripTrevira ® CS 0.1 8.9 No Laminate 34 10.5 11 Yes Laminate 35 0.4 5 NoLaminate 36 0.4 3.9 No

Laminate Examples 37-38

Laminates were prepared with meltable flammable and non-meltable,non-flammable outer textiles and thermal convective barrier, and thencontaminated with motor oil (SAE 15W-40 Mobil Delvac) and tested forafterflame and hole formation.

Laminate 37 was made using a 3.3 oz/yd2 Nomex IIIA plain weave facefabric, and Thermally Stable Convective Barrier 3. The laminate wasconstructed as taught in laminate Example 1 by printing discrete dots ofpolymer resin (PR2) (without expandable graphite) onto thermally stableconvective barrier and adhering to the Nomex fabric. Another laminate 38was prepared essentially the same manner except that PR2 was replacedwith a mixture of polymer resin expandable graphite. The polymer resinin this example was PR2, and the polymer resin-expandable graphitemixture comprised 25 wt % Grafguard 160-80N. These two Nomex-basedlaminates and the Nylon based laminate from Laminate Example 30 werecontaminated with motor oil as per the Flammable Liquid ContaminationProcedure and tested as per Surface Impingement Flame Test. The resultsare presented in Table 6.

TABLE 6 Afterflame Time Laminate Example (seconds) Hole FormationLaminate 37 0 not recorded Laminate 38 0 No Laminate 30 0 No Laminate 37after 25 Yes contamination Laminate 38 after 11 No contaminationLaminate 30 after 0 No contamination

Laminate samples having a flammable meltable outer textile performedapproximately the same and laminate samples having a non-meltable,non-flammable outer textile when tested for afterflame and holeformation. However, once contaminated with motor oil, the laminateshaving a meltable flammable outer textile performed better than thelaminates having a non-meltable, non-flammable (Nomex) outer textilewhen tested for afterflame and hole formation.

While particular embodiments of the present invention have beenillustrated and described herein, the present invention should not belimited to such illustrations and descriptions. It should be apparentthat changes and modifications may be incorporated and embodied as partof the present invention.

The invention claims is:
 1. A garment comprising: a thermally protectivelaminate comprising: a flammable, meltable outer textile; a thermallystable textile backer, and a heat reactive material positioned betweenthe flammable, meltable outer textile and the thermally stable textilebacker; wherein the heat reactive material is configured to bond theflammable, meltable outer textile to the thermally stable textile backerand wherein the heat reactive material comprises a polymerresin-expandable graphite mixture of: (i) a crosslinked polymer and (ii)an expandable graphite, wherein the garment defines: (i) an enclosedinner area configured for a user and (ii) an exterior area outside ofthe garment, and wherein the thermally protective laminate is orientedsuch that the flammable, meltable outer textile is exposed to theexterior area outside of the garment and the thermally stable textilebacker is positioned opposite the flammable, meltable outer textile. 2.The garment of claim 1, wherein the heat reactive material is in theform of a pattern of printed discontinuous dots, lines or grids.
 3. Thegarment of claim 1, wherein the heat reactive material has a surfacecoverage between 30% and 80%.
 4. The garment of claim 1, wherein theheat reactive material is in a pattern of discrete dots.
 5. The garmentof claim 4, wherein the pattern has a pitch between 500 μm and 6000 μm.6. The garment of claim 1, wherein the thermally protective laminate iswaterproof and has a moisture vapor transmission rate (MVTR) greaterthan 1000 g/m²/24 hours.
 7. The garment of claim 1, wherein theexpandable graphite has an endotherm of greater than 100 J/g.
 8. Thegarment of claim 1, wherein the thermally protective laminate has a charlength of less than 20 cm when tested according to the Edge IgnitionTest.
 9. The garment of claim 1, wherein the flammable, meltable outertextile is selected from a polyamide and a polyester.
 10. The garment ofclaim 1, wherein the thermally stable textile backer is selected fromthe group consisting of aramids, flame resistant cottons, flameresistant rayon, modacrylic blends and combinations thereof.
 11. Thegarment of claim 1, wherein a weight of the thermally protectivelaminate is less than 15 oz/yd².
 12. The garment of claim 1, wherein thethermally protective laminate exhibits an afterflame of less than 20seconds when tested according to the Edge Ignition Test.
 13. The garmentof claim 1, wherein the expandable graphite expands at a temperaturebelow a pyrolysis temperature of the meltable outer textile.